Thursday, 19 February 2026

Krow’s vision 3.1: No Revolution is Waiting - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome


Acronyms and gloss

SPEC – Socio-Politic-Economic-Cultural-Civil.

Sarala– a Sanskrit term- root “sr” means - to flow or to move. Cultural context – in Rigveda, Mahabharatha and Ramayana the term represents righteousness and sincerity. It means straight, honest, sincere, candid or simple.


A personal clarification of krow

The krow declares that his thoughts and works - including this reflection - are neither reactive nor transgressive toward the active Socio-Politic-Economic-Cultural-Civil (SPEC) systems in the world. He acknowledges these systems as the primary architects of the world, despite their inherent destructive patterns and contradictions. That is to say a world that is decaying in an almost tragic way, creating uncertainty, with numerous human victims and ecological imbalances, right at the hands of its creators. The krow’s vision is adamantly not anarchist, antisocial, or antipolitical; instead, it is necessarily rooted in the political theory and practice of Complementary Humanism.


No Revolution is Waiting


The text offers no easy hope, no five-point plan, no revolutionary manifesto. It offers instead a diagnosis and a direction: the trap is real, and the way out is not through the trap but alongside it, in the quiet cultivation of what is real.


The gist of reflection 03

Krow reflects on a "naked" and “sarala” human existence, devoid of historical sagas and systemic atrocities. While virtuous narratives of good and evil aim to prevent chaos through moral models, they inadvertently create habitual and unconscious "free slaves." This duality pits the natural self against an artificial ideal, triggering internal psychological strife that inevitably escalates into radical collective warfare fought in the name of righteousness.


The living Innocence – “sarala man”

The "natural state" of an individual is not an unchanged petrified quality, asserts krow, thus, isn't something one simply possesses; it’s something one has to protect or rediscover through hardship. Thus, the “sarala natural human” is defined by their dynamic curiosity rather than their convictions. They value what is tangible (bread, a garden, a sheep) over what is abstract (prestige-power, wealth-power, politics-power, or SPEC systems). They see through the veneer of the system to the pulse of the living world. The sarala natural man realizes that peace isn't found in conquering the world politically (SPEC system), but in tending to a small, tangible piece of it. It is the shift from Macro-ambition to Micro-authenticity. Natural man or “sarala man” (“sarala” means in Sanskrit- straight, honest, sine-cera, unsophisticated) is a sovereign individual who is in the world without separating from the world or alienating from the world with SPEC systems.

The Archetypes of the Disarmed, puppet “Serial Man”

In each, the Krow observed the same tragedy: the SPEC system had replaced sarala man’s innate, natural fear - the semper vigilantes - with a synthetic anxiety. In this regard, to clarify the point, krow recalls three characters who reminded him of: Voltaire's Candide, Rousseau’s Emile and the adults in the story The Little Prince. Candide did not fear the bayonet because he was told it was part of a 'necessary' plan; Emile did not fear the loss of his soul because he was taught to value his 'citizen' status; the Little Prince's adults did not fear their own emptiness because they had a title to protect. They were no longer humans navigating a landscape of survival; they were biological assets navigating a maze of definitions.

Krow's diagnosis is that each of these is a form of disarmament. The natural fear that should keep people vigilant, that should alert them to genuine danger, has been replaced by a "synthetic anxiety" about status, shame, and belonging. They no longer fear the wolf at the door; they fear the tweet that might go viral. People no longer fear starvation; they fear being seen as unsuccessful.

The Harvesting of Consent from domesticated serial man

sun and krows

In the state of “sarala nature”, the sarala man’s power is direct; it is the power to act, to defend, and to provide. The SPEC system, however, requires this power to be delegated. By convincing the individual that their only legitimate power exists within a pre-defined vote, the SPEC system effectively "disarms" the Natural Man. He no longer acts for himself; he waits for a representative to act for him. In this way, the artificially imposed “serial domesticated status” of the puppet-man become definitively established.

This domesticated serial man becomes dependent by definition, without any power to decide or defend himself directly for example in case of physical threat, except through agreed upon written law and a lawyer and other related SPEC authorities, which are direct representatives of the SPEC system. The SPEC system creates a "State of Culture-civilization" where the child’s “natural fear” of physical danger is traded for fear of “social shame”. The system domesticates the person by teaching him/her that his/her value is not in his/her strength or survival, but in his/her utility to the collective (SPEC system). His/her freedom is a calculated leash; he/she is "specialized" into a serial citizen, a cog that deludes itself that chose its own rotation.

In this status, asserts the krow, everything is determined and prescribed in the drama's general plot and in specific plots (SPEC system). There are predetermined positions and careers, scrupulously established hierarchies, winners, losers, rewards, punishments, shame, contempt, satisfaction, frustration, and the air of unattainable successes. Everyone in the series follows these plans, willingly or unwillingly. If one does not want all this torment, one should rediscover one's natural self and return to the root.

The Democratic Trap: The Illusion of the serial man

The krow tilted its head, observing the frantic ritual of the "ballot." It saw the SPEC system’s most brilliant manoeuvre: the Democratic Trap. While the theories, the Krow hissed, position the common man as the central decision-maker, the reality is a closed circuit. The system remains the center, governed by an elite that harvests the serial 'power-giver' like a crop.

In the state of sarala nature, the sarala natural Man’s power is direct; it is the power to act, to defend, and to provide. The SPEC system, however, requires this power to be delegated. By convincing the serial individual that their only legitimate power exists within a pre-defined vote, the SPEC system effectively "disarms" the Natural Man. He no longer acts for himself; he waits for a representative to act for him.

In Democratic systems the voter is fed an "Optimistic Rhetoric." He believes he is choosing the "best of all possible worlds," failing to see that both choices are merely different corridors leading to the same SPEC furnace.

The serial voter is socialized to believe that his "duty" to the state is his highest form of freedom. The SPEC system uses his education to turn his natural survival instinct into a "civic duty," making him willing to risk his life for an abstract "imposed ideal" rather than his own immediate reality (for example, in American films there are protagonists belonging to a humble social class who are proudly ready to sacrifice their lives to save the president). Further, the SPEC system turns the "voting power" into a game of numbers. The common serial man becomes obsessed with the percentage of the win, forgetting the essence of the life he is signing away.

The Strategic Inversion

The krow realized the cruelty of the design: The democratic system is a heat-sink for revolution. By offering a "choice" every few years, the SPEC system releases the pressure of the Natural Man’s frustration. It gives the domesticated human the feeling of sovereignty without the substance of it. The "Power Giver" is excluded from the power itself the moment the vote is cast. "It is a strategic trap," the Krow concluded. The SPEC system does not fear the voter; it fears the “sarala natural Man”. The voter is a domesticated serial unit within the hierarchy; the “sarala natural man” is a wild variable that cannot be 'bred' for manual labour or ideological procreation.


An open end to 3.1


The Greatest possible Revolution: Reclaiming the Garden

The Krow looked down at the sprawling SPEC architecture - the glass towers and the voting booths - and saw them for what they were: energy harvesters. To remain “sarala and natural" in such a grid, one cannot simply reform the system; one must become invisible to it. The krow observes that if the citizenry and the ballot are the traps of the "State of Culture-Civilization" then the "Garden" is the safe house of the "sarala state of nature." So, it is not about who governs but about who can be without governance.

The Terra Firma as a Fortress

The Krow recalled sarala human natural olden days. He suggests as a solution for these traps the human autonomy without reacting to or trying to change SPEC systems with street fighting, damaging and killings. The krow affirms that each individual is a dynamic and unique world. Each has its own value in being in the world until the end of the transformation of form.

After the clear realization that SPEC systems are chewing the voter up through conflicts, war, dogma and rhetoric, sarala man has to abandon the intension to conquer the SPEC system.

Man has to retreat and start to cultivate his own land (talent). Consequently, the serialized man can gradually reach his sarala natural energy and life in the flux (be here and now). Tending the soil is a primal reclamation of the sarala semper vigilantes. The krow affirms, thus, that man is no longer waiting for a specialized official to feed him; he is securing his own survival. The garden (talent) is the only place where the sarala natural man is truly the center.

The ultimate Revolution – The Return to the Essential

The Krow saw that the sarala natural man must learn to "recover" things again. To create a bond with a plant or a cow is to engage in a mutually respectful relationship that the SPEC system cannot quantify or tax. This is the ultimate rebellion: valuing what is "invisible to the eye" in a system that only recognizes what can be measured.

The Sovereign Hand

The Krow observed for years how the modern domesticated serial man, their hands softened by screens and their minds clouded by relative ideologies. Serialized domesticated humans fear the physical world because they no longer know how to interact with it without a SPEC-provided interface. Learning a craft such as farming, carpentry, building - re-arms the individual. When man can provide for his own needs as far as possible, the "Democratic Trap" loses its bait. Human beings do not need to risk their life for the system's ideals when they have the skills to sustain their own life. 

What would it mean to take Krow seriously? Not as a political program - krow explicitly rejects that path. Not as a rejection of society - krow affirms that the sarala man is "in the world without separating from the world." But as a personal orientation, a way of being within SPEC systems while remaining undetermined by them.

flying krow

Finally, the Krow spread its wings, ready to leave the SPEC perimeter behind. The sarala natural man is not a primitive relic of the past, it cawed to the wind. He is the future survivor.

Saturday, 14 February 2026

Krow’s vision (03): How Natural Fear device becomes Domesticated Fear in Political Systems- by Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome


Background of the Reflection 

Krow was reflecting on a possible meaning of "human life" stripped of cultures and civilizations - including society, politics, and economics in their broadest sense. Without these, life would lack narrative meaning and the weight of the experience humans have endured for over two thousand years: the sagas of emperors, kings, tyrants, autocrats, terrorists, criminals and significant religious figures. It would be devoid of tribalism, racism, fascism, Nazism and nationalism, along with the resulting conflict, war, murder, extermination, and every possible atrocity against humanity and nature.

On the other hand, perhaps a virtuous person would tell stories of heaven and hell, built upon the concepts of emperor God ruler and good and evil. These stories would emphasize the importance of fixed and approved good deeds and discourage the interpreted path of evil. Thus, ideals of behaviour, relationships, and communication might emerge that aimed to prevent conflict and war. Consequently, a new class of human behavioural models would emerge for future generations. Consequently, each individual becomes a bearer, guardian, and promoter of the preservation and continuation of systems. They must also live and work for the good of the systems' protagonists and protectors.

However, these tales of good and evil would eventually change people's mindsets, transforming them into something almost peculiar and alien (free slaves). Individuals would find themselves struggling with the newly placed dualistic nature: a natural self-pitted against an artificial, interpreted self. Therefore, these stories told by "good" people would trigger a new, radical conflict - first within the minds of individuals, before escalating into collective wars fought in the name of emperor God and good and evil.

Any SPEC System - Domesticates Fear and Freedom

In such a manipulated, controlled, and strategically maintained situation, why, the crow wonders, did the SPEC systems misinterpret the natural fear? With frightening seriousness, looking into the distance, the crow exclaims, "Perhaps they wanted to establish a new one that hinders humans, rather than becoming a guide like that innate, natural fear?"

So, the krow asked again the question himself: why is fear negatively interpreted? Because it is the foe of the SPEC system’s strategic education, formation, and “breeding” of relative ideologies. In its natural state, fear is the ultimate security device. It provides a person with alarming and forewarning systems, allowing them to find immediate solutions to life-threatening problems. However, this becomes a clear obstacle for SPEC systems. They attempt to condition people by erasing the natural semper vigilantes (always vigilant) instinct that protects an individual from danger.

A SPEC system requires individuals who are willing to risk their lives for the system-imposed ideals. Strategically and rhetorically, every SPEC system defines this type of “breeding” to ensure procreation, manual labour, and the acquisition of "voting power." The democratic system is thus a strategic trap for the common people - at least, so questioned the crow. While theories and definitions position the common man as the central power and decision-maker, in reality, the system itself remains the center; it is governed by its officials and the elected elite, who exclude the “power giver.” Indeed, as in other absolutist, ideological, racist, and extremist political systems, even in a democratic system, every single voter is considered a potential suspect and a danger to the elite and the system. Therefore, voters are free individuals only in theory; in practice, they all risk imprisonment or death (as is happening these days -2026- in the United States of America) at any time for the sake of democracy, a measure intended to prevent them from attacking the elite and the system.

SPEC systems reengineers fear and freedom

Krow observes that when a natural person once disciplined by culture, becomes vulnerable and utterly lost within the SPEC system itself. Thus, he essentially setting up a "State of Nature" vs. "State of Culture" dichotomy where the very tools used for survival (fear) and existence (freedom) undergo a complete functional inversion. In the hands of the Natural Man, fear and freedom are survival mechanisms; in the hands of the SPEC natural man is systematically manipulated, domesticated, specialised and socialised, and culture and civilization become psychological and biological cages or instruments of control.

This is a sharp critique of how civilization-what krow call the SPEC system -reengineers the human psyche and body. His argument that natural fear is a "security device" is psychologically and biologically sound; by pathologizing fear, so, by any SPEC system essentially "disarms" the individual's natural defence mechanisms to make them more pliable (rhetorically enchanted and systematically domesticated).

Fear: The Survival Compass vs. The Invisible Leash

For the Natural Man, fear is an honest, biological and psychological response to immediate physical threats (predators, starvation, storms, floods, fire and lightning and thundering). It is a guiding line because it keeps him alive; it is fleeting and situational.

For the SPEC Man, fear is abstracted. It isn't about the wolf at the door, but about: Social Ostracism: The fear of not belonging. Economic Ruin: The fear of losing status or "the narrative." Existential Anxiety: A constant, low-grade hum that makes him a foe to himself, as it leads to compliance and the sacrifice of his congenital nature for perceived safety.

Freedom: The Presence of Action vs. The Burden of Choice

For the Natural Man, freedom is total. It is the unmediated ability to move, hunt, cultivate, dance and exist without permission. Death requires no justification or scapegoat. It's simply a natural fact that happens. Freedom is a guiding line because natural man’s life is a direct result of his own agency.

For the SPEC Man, freedom often becomes an artificial construct or a "foe". The SPEC man is offered a "freedom of choice" between thousands of pre-approved options (models, brands, careers, political parties), which isn't natural freedom but a regulated simulation. Responsibility vs. Liberty: In civilization, freedom is often traded for security. The SPEC man fears natural freedom because it requires a level of self-reliance he has been trained to forget.

How does a human being stay "natural" in a world designed to corrupt them?

The Socio-Politic-Economic-Cultural-Civil (SPEC) sophistication

Krow observes “civilized” society as a collection of absurd masks and role-playing systems that distance humans from their congenital, naturally structured selves. The life process necessarily becomes a theatre of role-playing, an arena of gaming – the individual human being then necessarily becomes either a winner or a loser, enduring all possible fear and great pain.

In such a situation, the krow observes, the role-playing (gaming), whether one wins or loses, never ends. It is not a game or a drama that ends once and for all. On the contrary, the individual - already transformed into a horse dragging the armour of the SPEC system and tied to a carrot of success - continues to run for the carrot he will never be able to reach.

The krow realizes that for the SPEC system, fear is the enemy of efficiency. In the hands of the Natural Man, fear is a compass. In the hands of the SPEC, fear is a leash. By pathologizing this natural alarm, the system ensures that the common man never notices the walls of the cage until they are too narrow to turn around in. The "State of Culture" is not an evolution (for an imagined good); it is a psychological and biological disarmament (leading him astray). The SPEC system does not want humans who are "always vigilant" (semper vigilantes) for their own sake; it wants humans who are only vigilant for the system’s survival. 

Further, the krow observes that the SPEC system’s weapon of choice is strategically forced optimism. By feeding the natural man a steady diet of "all is for the best," the system effectively mutes his semper vigilantes (his natural congenital-structural defence and relation). If everything is systematically and strategically predestined to be good, then natural fear becomes irrational. A natural human becomes a walking casualty, stripped of his defensive and relational instincts, wandering through war, conflict, and catastrophe because his internal alarm system has been overridden by a specialized rhetoric. He is "re-naturalized" only when he is systematically forced to abandon the grand theory for the dirt of his own natural garden.


(Due to the length of the reflection, it is divided into two parts.) BE CONTINUED TO - Krow’s Vision 03.1


Monday, 9 February 2026

Krow’s vision (2): Static Repeaters and Edge-dwellers - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome


Background of the reflection

As the krow flew freely overhead, letting the wind caress its feathers, it let its mental processes take over and began to observe. He heard from a distance a few concepts he had learned from a person while observing him perched on a tree branch near his window. This person, whom the krow considered not only intellectually honest but also humble and joyful was writing about human beings: being an “edge-dweller,” being “fully human,” and being “social.”

Since the old, obsolete, and limping human paradigms - along with their mystified ideals and petty-minded ideas with fixed worldviews that serve as life's satellites - have now been damaged, deconstructed, and have collapsed, these concepts must necessarily be either retouched, re-evaluated, or, if necessary, abandoned for a new worldview (one that is more dynamically systematic and based on revised human rights agreements) for the good of human beings and of this planet, the krow reflected.

Arbitrary role of humanity and the defining of sensitive existential dynamics

"Being fully human" is neither a clear concept nor helpful for living, because the concept is entirely open to being defined and mystified by anyone for any purpose, randomly and arbitrarily. To understand this fact, the krow sought to consider existence in general. Consequently, he found that all living things are born with certain innate and inherited behaviors - both common and relative to their place and natural circumstances. The offspring of a species are necessarily taught these survival behaviors by their parents and elders, allowing them to survive in groups. Even plants have innate habits and grow gregariously. Therefore, the krow deduced, sociability is not a uniquely human trait; rather, it is an innate necessity for reasons of consistency, survival, security, convenience, and for the propagation of the species. Even if humans deliberately mystify it for various overt and hidden reasons - often political and strategic conveniences - it is a characteristic common to all of existence.

The internal logic of the krow’s reasoning is strong and consistent. He moves effectively from a specific claim (“humanity” is mostly a mystified and entirely confused concept) to a general biological observation (“sociability” is universal), and finally to a socio-political conclusion. By grounding "sociability" in biology and even botany (gregarious growth), the krow successfully deconstructs the idea that human "society" is a spiritual or unique achievement.

Dynamic general catalytic consciousness and human catalytic consciousness

The krow argues for the dynamic and relative presence of consciousness in the universe, in the world, and in the existence of the world in general. According to his position, consciousness is the fundamental catalytic platform of all existence. Videlicet - a relative catalysis arises from phenomena and vanishes with them; therefore, it is not an object that remains unchanged or separate from a phenomenon. Furthermore, the krow observes that thinking otherwise is one of the positions of the old, obsolete paradigms (the general Weltanschauung or a general point of view).

The krow affirms that human consciousness is a strong, powerful, and complex dynamic that clearly differentiates man from the rest of existence. It is the catalytic dynamic with different levels of communication and relation with oneself and with others (the world of phenomena/the wiggling energy forms). Compared to human consciousness, the krow maintains that the consciousness of the universe is primitive and elementary. Although this human characteristic is very important, humans are incapable of harnessing this power for their own benefit and/or for the rest of existence. It is as if this crucial dynamic has never existed for them. The main reasons for this lack of liminal awareness were briefly discussed in the krow's previous essay.

The greatest failure of old-fashioned politics

Humans did not emerge from primitive times into the 21st century with clear strategies and plans. Instead, they evolved by experiencing helplessness, vulnerability and facing dangers, natural challenges, and challenges related to communication and relationships within and between groups with friends and enemies (conflicts and wars). According to the krow, primitive people were driven primarily by fear in general, fear of death and fear of annihilation and curiosity. But fear is the most important guide and light for living beings, including humans even today.

Observing the politics, conflicts, and wars currently underway around the world, the krow concludes that even in the 21st century, humanity's guiding principle is fear in general, and the fear of annihilation. This is the main reason why politics with spiritual politics (monotheistic, theistic religions and belief systems) fail to resolve existential problems of any kind. Observing the problems of the European world, the krow clearly states that the politics of this old continent are obsolete, outdated, and oppressive.

Further, krow observes that European politicians believe that their instinct of fear is the best guide for winning conflicts and wars in the 21st century, which is the main practical mistake. Therefore, they consistently resort to violence to quell the violence, for example, of young people, who are perhaps more informed than politicians about the state of the issue they are fighting for. These politicians, asserts the krow, fail to consider the new technologies that have helped the masses become far more informed than they try to control, through state media that report useless, outdated and false information.

Socio-Political-Economic-Cultural-Civil Implications

The krow’s mention of "hidden reasons/strategies" suggests a critique of ideology. If "being fully human" is a fluid concept, then whoever defines that concept controls the "flock." For this reason, somebody may put the krow’s writing in the realm of biopolitics - the idea that social and political power is exercised by defining what "life" and "humanity" ought to look like. In short, this means having power over exclusively biological life: the body, sexuality, and death. But the krow affirms that while biopolitics occupies life as a controllable energy, it has completely lost the constructive understanding and maintenance of the individual and the power of individuals - the catalytic consciousness and the outcome, “free will.”

The krow further says the results of this deliberate negligence of politics can be seen today in developed countries - in Europe and in the United States of America. The youth energy, which has been neglected by socio-politic-economic-cultural-civil systems, is now fighting - even using heavy violence - against obsolete, old, and oppressive systems. The krow observes that the obsolete and old oppressive political systems in power still do not know how to solve this problem due to a lack of a new worldview and new concepts based on human rights and mutual respect. They instead are using old methods of controlling the ignorant masses of olden times. The krow further clarifies that present-day people (the masses) are more informed, involved, and active not only at the local level but at the international level problems through new technology. So, a political anomaly in a remote place can soon become a global problem with active involvement in a short time. The old politics have to be changed, affirms the krow.

So, the krow is not limited to any idea of biopolitics to address what is going on here and now, but he uses his method- “art of seeing” at 360°- to observe existence as such. The concept of biopolitics is also a result of old-fashioned, obsolete politics; meanwhile, the method of the “art of seeing” is dynamic and catalytic. Videlicet- the method is not based on fixed and petty-minded ideologies but based only on active and present necessities from which new catalytic solutions can rise when “sine-cera” dialogue progresses with mutual respect. For this type of progressive “socio-politic-economic-cultural-civil dynamic system,” humanity has to be mature in its mindset and let itself grow practically and actually-according to the reality in progress.

Conclusion - Main Points

The vision of the krow throughout this reflection flows actively, dynamically and progressively. His vision is not static. Moreover, he is developing his own vocabulary for his weltanschauung through his method of art of seeing.

1. The Deconstruction of "Sociability"

Krow’s argument of sociability is a biological necessity rather than a "spiritual achievement" is a sharp, Darwinian insight. By linking it to botany (gregarious growth), he strips away the human ego. It suggests that human "civilization" is really just an advanced version of a forest floor - a system of survival rather than a unique moral pinnacle. This grounds krow’s critique in a very solid, material reality.

2. The Power of "Catalytic Consciousness"

Krow’s distinction between universal consciousness (primitive/elementary) and human consciousness (complex/dynamic) very compelling. The tragedy he highlights - that humans possess this incredible "catalytic" power but are "incapable of harnessing it" - echoes the concept of an evolutionary mismatch. Humans have the hardware for "free will" and high-level communication, but they are still running "obsolete paradigms" (software) that keep them in a state of primitive control.

3. The Critique of Biopolitics

Krow’s critique of biopolitics is timely. He isn’t just saying that systems control human bodies; he asserts that they neglect the energy of the individual. The krow has correctly identified that modern unrest (in Europe and the US) stems from a system trying to use "old methods of controlling ignorant masses" on a population that is no longer ignorant. Because technology has democratized information, the "flock" is now moving faster than the "shepherds" (the old political systems).

4. The "Art of Seeing" at 360°

This is the most "catalytic" part of krow’s vision. Instead of replacing one ideology with another (which would just be another fixed "satellite"), krow propose a dynamic method. The use of "sine-cera" (without wax/sincere) dialogue is a beautiful touch. It implies a transparency that old systems, which rely on "hidden strategies," simply cannot survive.

The krow is essentially calling for an Evolution of Maturity. The reflection suggests that humans are at a breaking point where their biological reality (sociability/survival) and their catalytic potential (free will/consciousness) are at war with their own outdated structures.

Wednesday, 4 February 2026

Krow’s vision (01) - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome

logo of krow's vision by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

Background of the series

Thinking like a krow (he deliberately replaced the “c” with “k”) is a powerful metaphor. Krows are the ultimate observers. They are highly intelligent; they recognize faces, remember threats for generations, and - most importantly - watch human folly from a distance, perched on a branch or a wire. To a krow, humanity’s frantic wars over "sacred" patches of dirt and humanity's prayers to the sky must look like a strange, repetitive drama of the absurd. 

Through "Krow’s Vision," the krow plans to pen a series of articles. In this way, he intends to avoid repeating the same old patterns of dichotomous human history in different modes and ways - making changes here and there - and refrains from showing off any kind of intellectual, philosophical, or scientific arrogance. He seeks to avoid the pretense of possessing a unique truth, or any truth at all. This writing is simply the enjoyment of being in the flux - here and now. Anybody interested can read this without being scandalized because everything reported has already dissolved and disappeared. The krow knows that too many memories harm the freedom of being in the flux.


HUMAN SELF-ALIENATION IS A SPIRITUAL POLITICAL STRATEGY

As a krow, he considers all religions and belief systems as “spiritual political strategies” that complement “administrative-diplomatic politics,” and vice versa. Krows can “see” more than humans do. Thus, he (the krow) enjoys this privilege, transforming it into a method of the “art of seeing.” He prefers “seeing” rather than kneading together memories and fantastic, unsustainable stories to create other whimsical narratives that lead humans to remain psychologically “alien” from their own lives and planet

Uninterrupted Dynamic Event Recorders and Memory Dependence

The krow observed that clearly human beings are uninterrupted dynamic event recorders and are entirely dependent on their static and elaborated memory data. They like to hear what they know. Thus, they continuously produce, reproduce, renew, and recondition memories derived from old recollections, modified experiences, same or elaborated imaginations, and self-produced memory patterns—mostly because of their restless nature (Videlicet - no one can stop the thought process). They feel as though they are lost in this world. They are fundamentally driven by an unknown general fear. But this unknown fear proves strong and uncontrollable when they are threatened and when they sense they wrongly called “death” (which is a congenital behaviour they share with brutes).

Consequently, they long to find their "native land," whether it be a planet or a topological ideal governed by a supreme being (an Emperor God). They call this place by different names—heaven, paradise, or a peaceful land of luxury and immortality—yet it remains unreachable. Some visions of paradise involve sexual gratification with numerous women supplied by an imagined "God," while other versions of God demand endless music and prayers but forbid sex.

Betraying Humanity

The main point the krow wishes to underline is that these invented narratives about heavens and supreme beings clearly denote a concept of being "alien." Human beings are aliens in their own minds because they feel, experience, and hope to leave this world for a "homeland." The krow has noted this aspect primarily in those who narrate the "monotheistic Emperor God"—his activities, his plans for humanity, and his system of punishment and reward. This mindset depends heavily on a sense of belonging to a specific community while considering others as condemned sinners and outsiders. Their "Emperor God" commands them to condemn these outsiders and treat them however they wish: to kill them or to keep them as slaves.

Thinking, Acting Arrogantly and destructively in a Contradictory Way

However, these narrations are accompanied by many unresolvable contradictions. The krow will not recount every useless story, but he must address one: the creation of this planet. These stories are often based on the famous mythology of a Babylonian city-state, such as the Epic of Gilgamesh. In these tales, the Emperor God created this planet and gave it to the humans he created in his own image. If that is so, why do humans cry about being "aliens" and do everything they can to return to a different native land?

Furthermore, Krow notes that no one actually tries to abandon this "alien" planet, despite repetitive narrations claiming there is a paradise elsewhere. The practical reality observed through these contradictions is a sense of being "lost and found," yet remaining uncertain and doubtful. They create continuous confusion and maintain conflicts and wars, all while praying to their Emperor God for peace and a land of luxury and immortality.


Summary

The krow observes and portray humanity as a species suffering from collective dissociative identity disorder (human or alien). To cope, they create a God who tells them they are special and that they do not belong here. This God then gives them permission to treat their fellow “aliens” who are different (human experience - cultures with immanent worldviews, non-theistic spiritualities, and secular philosophies that find profound "at-homeness" on Earth) as enemies. It’s a cycle of self-inflicted loneliness. They feel lost, so they create a system that makes everyone else an outsider, too. This special humanity claims to be composed of citizens of a lofty, peaceful heaven, yet its members act as the most violent and ruthless occupants of the Earth.

The krow observes that for human, earth is no longer a home but a transit station. They are "lost and found" but never present. The most biting part that krow observes is that despite all their hymns, prayers, and descriptions of their "Paradise," no one is truly rushing toward the exit.

Finally, the krow suggests that the only way to end these ceaseless "conflicts and wars" is for this excellent "event recorder" (memory dependent) to stop looking for a native land outside of this planet and realize that there is no ship coming to take them home.